Painfully stock 1981 Honda CBX
- dcarver220b
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- Posts: 937
- Thanks: 198
Painfully stock 1981 Honda CBX
2 years 7 months ago
The following user(s) said Thank You: biltonjim, zed_thirteen
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Kawboy
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- Posts: 3160
- Thanks: 1116
Re: Painfully stock 1981 Honda CBX
2 years 7 months ago
She's a beauty Don. Brings back memories for me. I had a '79 and an '80 both in Candy Glory Red. Such a head turner.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- biltonjim
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 961
- Thanks: 248
Re: Painfully stock 1981 Honda CBX
2 years 7 months ago
Thanks for the well presented video. CBX-B model, I believe. Truly a mobile work of art. I'd have one in the house, just to look at!
How would you describe the riding experience? And how does it compare to the KZ1300?
How would you describe the riding experience? And how does it compare to the KZ1300?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- PaulD
- Offline
- Premium Member
- Posts: 126
- Thanks: 29
Re: Painfully stock 1981 Honda CBX
2 years 7 months ago
It’s a shame Honda moved away from the original design CBX1000Z, that in my opinion is probably the best looking road bike ever made
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- dcarver220b
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Sustaining Member
- Posts: 937
- Thanks: 198
Re: Painfully stock 1981 Honda CBX
2 years 7 months agoLike most of us, if it was in the da house, I'd have woman-less house?Thanks for the well presented video. CBX-B model, I believe. Truly a mobile work of art. I'd have one in the house, just to look at!
How would you describe the riding experience? And how does it compare to the KZ1300?
Compared? KZ is a torque motor capable of spinning, the CBX is 'horsepower' engine. CBX needs more revs at launch and more clutch control. Both, by today's standards, spin too high RPM for MPH. Both suck fuel, 32 - 36 mpg, sometimes less..
Between the two, I prefer the KZ! With 6-1 DG exhaust, it's simply an auditory delight. Makes me feel like I'm doing a buck-20 when it's only 75? Fit and Finish? CBX, hands down winner.
The following user(s) said Thank You: biltonjim, zed_thirteen
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- z13phil
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 69
- Thanks: 8
Re: Painfully stock 1981 Honda CBX
2 years 6 months ago
Well I own both of them, you couldn't get two bikes so different ! Z13 brakes much better, suspension better, seating position better, a feeling of being very well planted when riding. Engine lot's more torque than the CBX. with two slash cut pipes sounds great. When its running well !!!! (this is my big problem with the Z13. So thats why i purchased the CBX A model, in mint condition, original HM exhaust system, So quiet you cant hear anything. Look's, everyone seems to love the CBX even my wife. She is not a lover of the Z13, I told her well thats a mans bike
If I didnt have running issues with the Z13 i would have not seen the need to buy the CBX. thats my thoughts
The following user(s) said Thank You: blackzook
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.173 seconds