This particular "MOD" makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up on end. In the world I came from we had NICR's - Non Identical Component Replacement. and I'm sure Tyler with his background in engineering will attest to this. Before replacing components with similar designs we had to follow a process to justify that the "new " component met or exceeded the requirements of the old component. Engineers had to go to great lengths to prove that the new component met the requirements of the NICR.
Taking a ZX11 tensioner and hacking off 10mm from the spring length - YIKES!!!
Compression springs are engineered to have a force at a predetermined compression length and a compressive force at a working length. I have NO idea of the working stroke of the ZX11 tensioner as compared to the working stroke of the KZ1300 tensioner nor the spring pressures of either unit. Because of the nylon gear, the spring pressure should be by design nearly the same at both ends of the working stroke. If the ZX11 spring has too much force at the fully compressed point then it suggests to me that the spring is of a heavier gauge than the spring on the KZ1300 and as such the compressive force of the ZX11 spring will diminish quicker than the KZ1300 spring.
So here's where the hair on my neck stands up. Will there be enough compressive force acting on the tensioner when the chain is near it's service limit? Did anybody "do the math" and determine the forces on both the ZX11 spring and the KZ1300 spring over the working range of the tensioner?? I don't see anywhere in the posts on this site where that information got posted.
Just being the Devil's advocate here and trying to stimulate thought, especially to those who've gone ahead and done this "MOD"